Take Stock: Commentary on Berkshire Hathaway

In the wake of Warren Buffett’s announcement to step down, Bridges Trust CEO Nick Wilwerding and CIO Jack Holmes reflect on the significance of this leadership transition. Together, they explore what it may mean for Berkshire Hathaway’s future and its shareholders.

DISCLOSURES: Thought Leadership Disclosures

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q1 2025 – Navigating Policy Uncertainty

The stock market entered 2025 riding the optimism of above-average earnings growth expectations, a growing economy and moderating inflation. In a matter of weeks, a seemingly orderly market rotation quickly escalated into a historic rout following extraordinary trade policy changes from the Trump administration.

In our view, risk premiums at the start of the year were not properly discounting the potential economic repercussions of a prolonged trade war, seemingly anchored towards the softer negotiation tactics of Trump’s first term. Perhaps this will be considered an overreaction in time, but for now, we believe the market is rapidly adjusting to the increased uncertainty of paralyzed global trade activity, raising the probability of a recession and/or stagflation for the economy in the short-term.

As a result of these growth concerns, Treasury bond yields have moved lower and expectations for rate cuts have increased since the start of the year. In our opinion, the Fed’s ability to meaningfully cut rates in an environment of low unemployment and/or rising inflation will be very difficult, especially when graded against their dual mandate.

Regarding structural universal tariffs, economist support is likely scarce at best. Global supply chains were developed over several decades and U.S. consumers and businesses have benefitted tremendously, despite potential opportunities to improve fairness in trade. Ignoring the merits of specialization, onshoring manufacturing plants in a matter of months or even years doesn’t seem practical, so we believe the more reasonable solution is a compromise on tariffs. Based on the initial retaliatory responses from U.S. trading partners, and the stock market’s reaction, there appears to be at least some doubt in the likelihood of a successful imminent compromise.

The risk also appears relatively binary in nature, in that we either succeed in negotiations with trading partners, or we don’t. We believe the risk of a recession increases the longer tariffs remain substantively in place. The ability to pivot, as needed, could reduce the potential materiality of any economic slowdown, in our view.

While self-imposed trade policy headwinds appear to be relatively “fixable”, fiscal spending remains a longer-term dilemma for the U.S. economy. As the U.S. focuses on spending cuts, other countries such as Germany and China have implemented additional stimulus measures. Supported by these fiscal initiatives, discounted valuations and a weaker U.S. dollar, international stocks have shown relative strength to start the year.

Over the long-term, we believe the U.S. maintains structural advantages for capital formation, supported by a more pervasive entrepreneurial and pro-business mindset.  American businesses have shown incredible resiliency, adapting to various political and economic regimes over time. We believe globalization has been a major disinflationary tailwind over the past several decades, and a reversal is likely to test this resiliency.     

In the near-term, we believe corporate earnings estimates are too high and are likely to be revised down in the coming months as companies revise or simply remove their outlooks due to prevailing uncertainty. While most businesses are likely to feel the effects of an economic slowdown or potential stagflation scenario, we believe companies with relatively strong pricing power and defensible balance sheets can weather this environment better, on average.

Over the past 45 years, the S&P 500 has experienced an average intra-year decline of 14%, posting positive returns in 34 of those 45 years, with an average annual return of 10.6%. Living through regular market declines is the ante for investors who choose to invest their money into stocks. While market declines all come with unique catalysts, they are almost all discomforting for investors in the moment. When sentiment is most gloomy, buying opportunities can be most prevalent, but more so in retrospect. We appear to be at or near that level of sentiment today.  

When we started the year, we lowered our return expectations for U.S. large cap equities for the second half of this decade, primarily due to elevated valuations. With the recent market selloff, valuations are starting to look more reasonable, increasingly so for mid and small cap companies, which we continue to see as the most attractive areas for capital returns in the coming years.  

Further, when we have periods of indiscriminate selling, it affords us opportunities to acquire or increase our conviction in high quality companies at discounts to what we see as their long-term intrinsic value. Understanding things may get worse before they get better, we stand ready to take advantage of these opportunities.

Authored by: Jack Holmes, Chief Investment Officer

Market Commentary Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q4 2024

Inflated Expectations

Bridges Trust Q4 2024 Market Commentary

As we cross the halfway mark of the decade, we find it worthwhile to consider how far the pendulum has swung in terms of the economy and sentiment in such a relatively short span of time.

The S&P 500 produced an annualized total return of 14.5% for the five years ending 12/31/24, a period that included two separate market declines of more than 25%, one triggered by a global pandemic and unprecedented economic standstill, the other by the inflation surge that followed. In a period not devoid of reasons to be cautious, the S&P 500 was able to post total returns greater than 25% in three of those five years. 

It is a reminder to us that investors seldom “earn” their equity returns by experiencing a bunch of average years in the stock market. They typically do so by living through the volatility of many above-average years and some below-average years, with plenty of reasons to be skeptical along the way.

Just two years ago, the consensus heading into 2023 was for an imminent recession that never materialized. Instead, economic growth consistently surprised to the upside, and the S&P 500 posted its best back-to-back years since the late 1990s. We are reminded of the old joke that macroeconomists have successfully predicted nine out of the past five recessions.

The U.S. economy remains the beacon of strength globally, supported by a resilient consumer and, in our opinion, structural advantages for capital formation. This has led to capital inflows and persistent strength in the U.S. dollar, despite what we see as an unsustainable level of deficit spending from the U.S. government, typically reserved for an economic crisis.

Moving forward, we believe that growth will be dependent on improvements in economic and corporate productivity, at least partly supported by success in technological innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI). As of now, those benefits have primarily flowed to companies benefiting from the buildout of AI infrastructure, with the return on these investments still in question. Corporate earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026 are well above historical averages, and to us, somewhat contingent on these investments paying off, through AI or otherwise.

Stock market leadership has remained historically narrow with U.S. large cap technology companies taking an increased share of both earnings and index weightings this past year. While we would expect participation to broaden out, the rest of the market has recently disappointed relative to earnings expectations, and relative to the financial performance of the market’s leaders. As a result, the average stock trades at a considerable discount compared to the market as a whole, and we continue to find better value in deploying capital down the market cap spectrum, while keeping a bias towards quality.  

The bond market has started to discount the possibility of interest rates staying higher for longer. Despite the Federal Reserve cutting the Federal Funds rate a full percent from September through December, the 10-year Treasury yield actually increased nearly a full percent from the September cut through the end of the year. Expectations for future rate cuts have come down, while the long-term “neutral” rate from the Fed has ticked higher.

We anticipate trade, deficit spending and other policy risks, as well as the general momentum of the economy will likely drive the direction of interest rates next year. As it stands today, Treasury yields trade near our estimate of fair value, with resurgent inflation as a primary risk for bondholders.  

Overall, risk premiums have narrowed across the investment landscape. Corporate credit spreads hover near 25-year lows and the S&P 500 trades for 22x forward earnings estimates, well above its long-term average.

In our opinion, the increase in both absolute and relative U.S. large cap equity valuations can be at least partly explained by the improving profitability and constituent makeup of the S&P 500 index. Even so, the implied hurdle rate is much higher, broadly speaking, with valuations where they are today. As a result, our own base return expectations are now meaningfully lower for the back half of this decade. While our overall expectations are somewhat muted, we also believe that strong businesses tend to surprise to the upside over time. We remain focused on owning businesses with sustainable competitive advantages, long reinvestment runways with above-market growth, and reasonable valuations.

As always, thank you for your confidence and should you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out.

Sincerely,

Jack Holmes, Chief Investment Officer

Market Commentary Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q3 2024

Market Breadth Improves as the Fed Pivots

A person's hands holding a tablet with a dynamic financial growth chart displayed on-screen, surrounded by a futuristic blend of digital finance and analytics imagery.

For the first six months of the year, the stock market rally was relatively narrow, driven by superior earnings strength and performance of mega-cap technology stocks. In the third quarter, we saw early signs of a potential shift in leadership with cyclicals and small caps outperforming. Only 25% of stocks in the S&P 500 managed to outperform the index in the first 6 months of the year, the lowest since 1999. Over 60% of stocks outperformed the index in Q3, the highest level since 2002. 

We would attribute at least part of this change to interest rates moving lower, as rate-sensitive sectors tended to outperform. In any case, this looks to be a healthy rotation in what has been a very strong two year run for the stock market. As we look out into 2025, earnings growth is expected to broaden out, which may support more expansive market participation, assuming results live up to expectations.

The 2-year Treasury yield dropped more than a full percentage point from July through September, as anticipation for rate cuts gained momentum. The Fed may have had sufficient rationale to lower rates in July following tepid inflation and employment reports, but instead opted for a 50 basis point reduction in September, forecasting another half percent reduction by year-end. Regardless of the timing of future rate moves, we would expect yields on cash to be much lower by the end of 2025, unless inflation resurfaces or economic activity materially accelerates.

Now that we have the long-awaited first interest rate cut of this cycle, many investors may be wondering what that means for the stock market going forward. Looking back to prior cycles would tell us that the subsequent results are mixed, but the economic environment in which the Fed shifts to accommodation seems to matter. 

Since 1970, there have been seven instances in which the Fed started cutting rates when the economy was not in a recession. The S&P 500 was higher a year later in all 7 instances, by an average of 15.8%. In the 5 instances in which the Fed started cutting rates during a recession, the S&P 500 was lower a year later by an average of 2.3%.

While things can change, we do not believe the U.S. is currently in a recession, nor on the immediate verge of entering one. Economic growth continues to surprise to the upside, with Q2 gross domestic product (GDP) recently getting revised upwards to 3% growth year-over-year. As of September 30th, third quarter GDP was also projected to grow between 2-3%, according to the Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now indicator.

As pandemic-era stimulus benefits continue to fizzle out, the consumer is starting to face some headwinds, evidenced by rising credit delinquencies, especially on the low-end of the economic scale. Thus far, economic growth has remained resilient, and loosening of monetary policy may slowly help to ease the interest burden for those needing to borrow. Two likely beneficiaries are small companies, who often rely on access to financing tied to floating rates, as well as homebuyers who have stalled on purchasing from the combination of higher rates and rising home prices. 

Less clear to us is how the U.S. government ultimately handles its own massive debt burden that continues to compound from rising interest costs and deficit spending. Historically, running such large fiscal deficits has been reserved for emergency responses to recessions, not when economic conditions are as healthy as they are today. The annualized net interest cost on the nation’s outstanding debt recently surpassed the annual defense spending budget for the first time ever. This seems unsustainable, but we don’t see this changing in the near-term, regardless of who wins the election.

“Buy into a business that’s doing so well an idiot can run it, because sooner or later, one will. The U.S. is sort of like that.”

-Warren Buffett

This Buffett quote is more akin to the evaluation of economic moats for businesses, but we might consider that appropriate when evaluating the implications of policymakers overseeing the U.S. economy. Regardless of who wins the election, we still believe the U.S. holds structural advantages for investors over the long-term. American businesses have demonstrated over time that they can adapt and thrive regardless of who is in public office, as evidenced by stock market returns under both republican and democratic leadership.

The upcoming election will likely take at least some of the spotlight for investor sentiment in the near-term. And while elections matter, we believe they matter less as it relates to forecasting expected returns for the stock market. Investors would be better served to leave politics out of their investment decisions, in our view.

Overall, the S&P 500 is off to its strongest 9 months to start a year since 1997. We believe this is driven by above-average earnings growth that has so far lived up to expectations. Expectations are even higher as we look forward into 2025, with stock valuations presumably discounting substantial earnings growth to come.

This sets the bar very high for upside surprises moving forward, likely requiring more expansive participation across the market, supported by a healthy and growing economy.

In conclusion, I would like to take a moment to express my gratitude for your ongoing support of Bridges Trust. As I move forward in my new role as Chief Investment Officer, I am committed to providing valuable insights as we navigate the evolving capital market landscape together. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please don’t hesitate to reach out to your Relationship Manager.

Sincerely,

Jack Holmes, Chief Investment Officer

Market Commentary Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q2 2024

DIVERGENCE

Coming into the year, the biggest hurdles we saw for the stock market were the lofty expectations for corporate earnings and further moderation of inflation. As it relates to earnings, so far, so good. Analyst estimates for both 2024 and 2025 have held steady since the start of the year, which is counter to the historical trend of revisions being biased to the downside.   

After an upside surprise in Q1, inflation resumed its trend lower in the second quarter, with the May Core Personal Consumption Expenditures index closing in on the Fed’s target level. Along with some emerging cracks in the labor market, the Fed has an improving setup to start lowering rates in the back half of the year, in our view. We wouldn’t expect significant rate cuts, absent a material economic slowdown, but the path towards easing looks increasingly likely based on recent data and Fed commentary.

With growth stalling in Europe (again), the European Central Bank took the lead on cutting rates in June. Divergent monetary policy makes sense given the underlying differences in economic and financial conditions, but we would expect a general trend towards easing from global central banks over the next few years.

It is also evident to us, that the American economy and businesses maintain structural advantages over developed economy peers in a world of scarce growth, which supports our bias in capital allocation.

As for the U.S. consumer, sentiment has remained somewhat disconnected from activity, with spending holding up better than expected despite the weight of elevated prices. Part of that may be the lingering tailwind of excess pandemic savings, and more recently the wealth effect from rising financial assets, especially the rapid appreciation in home values.

Such resiliency may not last. According to the Federal Reserve, Americans have now spent through the entirety of the $2 trillion in excess savings accumulated during the pandemic, as of the end of March. Along with rising credit delinquencies, and the increasing cost of debt service as a percentage of disposable income, we expect spending to face headwinds moving forward.

Although a slowdown in spending doesn’t sound all-too-rosy for the economy, recession odds in the short-run appear to be low. As we noted in our Q1 commentary, 1995 is the only other Fed hiking cycle since the end of World War II that did not end with a recession. The market seems to be assigning a high probability to this soft-landing scenario, which may be the best possible outcome after such rapid tightening in financial conditions.    

The stock market is off to a very healthy start to 2024, but divergence between winners and losers continued to widen in the second quarter. Despite the S&P 500 gaining 4% in the second quarter, and closing near an all-time high, the S&P 500 equal-weight index, which assigns the same weighting to Apple as it does Campbell Soup, declined 2.6% this past quarter. Year to date, the equal weight index was up 5%, as compared to the 14% gain in the market cap-weighted S&P 500. Small cap stocks, as measured by the S&P 600, declined 3% in Q2 and were down 1% through the first 6 months of the year.

The relative outperformance of the largest companies has so far been commensurate with vastly superior financial performance. For example, in the first quarter, net income for the “Magnificent 7*” increased 52% year-over-year, whereas the rest of the S&P 500 saw net income decline 9%. As we look forward, our views are earnings growth should start to converge for the remainder of 2024 and into 2025. Assuming results meet these relatively lofty expectations, market breadth could improve. 

We believe a large part of the optimism supporting corporate earnings estimates centers around the impacts of spending and efficiencies related to artificial intelligence. While we are inclined to discount some of the more extreme forecasts of what this means for economic productivity, we do see the appeal of such major, cross-industry applications. It is also a welcome catalyst to what could go right in a mature economy, when so often the narrative focuses on what could go wrong.

As for valuations, the S&P 500 now trades at 21x earnings, which seems high on an absolute basis, but reasonable if estimates for earnings growth hold up. Valuation is heavily influenced by the top 10 weightings which trade for 30x earnings and now make up 37% of the index. The other 490 companies trade for an average valuation of around 16x, close to the long-term average. Small and mid-cap stocks are also trading near their long-term average valuations, on suppressed earnings.  

Optimism may be high for the largest companies, and for good fundamental reasons, but we don’t get the sense this bullishness has reached an extreme level yet. Net inflows to equity funds have been underwhelming, and there remains substantial cash parked in money market funds.

We would expect volatility to rise from historically low levels, with the S&P 500 having now gone 340 trading days without a 2% daily decline, the third longest streak of the past 25 years. Sentiment around earnings, Fed policy and the election are likely to be the catalysts to that changing in the second half.

– Bridges Investment Committee

* Magnificent 7 refers to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla

Market Commentary Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

A Nod to History and an Eye to the Future

Commentary by Ted Bridges

Ted Bridges, 2024

Bridges Trust is at the cusp of the next chapter in its history that dates to 1945, when the Firm was founded by Marvin W. Bridges, who was the 208th registrant under the Securities Act of 1940 and the first registrant in Nebraska.

Since that time, the Firm has been led by a member of the Bridges Family.

On July 1, Nick Wilwerding will become the Chief Executive Officer of Bridges Trust, and Jack Holmes will become the Chief Investment Officer of Bridges Trust, positions that I have held for decades.

This transition is the result of succession planning that is designed to position the Firm as a premier investment management and trust services organization – one with talent and experience that can be brought to bear for its multi-generational client base and situate the Firm for growth in the depth and breadth of its service capabilities for generations to come.

The Outlook 

Bridges Trust has seen remarkable growth, with assets under management rising from approximately $2 billion to $9.5 billion, client relationships doubling from 300 to 600, and employees tripling from 25 to 75 since 2017. The firm now offers its most extensive range of investment strategies and client services to date and brand recognition has notably increased. With the firm’s investment performance, robust organizational momentum, and a client-centric culture, we are well-equipped to compete to win large, complex new client mandates. Bridges Trust is poised for continued success as it enters the next chapter in its history.

Bridges Trust has never had stronger client relationships, a stronger service platform, stronger processes, more talent, and more significant growth opportunities than it does today.

I believe the success of Bridges Trust in coming decades will rest on six primary pillars:

  1. The support and patience of our client base
  2. The talent, creativity, resilience, and work ethic of our people
  3. Our ability to effectively help meet client objectives through adroit management of client assets
  4. Our willingness and ability to innovate, develop, and successfully implement new investment strategies and ancillary services that meet ever-increasing complexity in both capital markets and client needs
  5. Our ability to effectively leverage our most powerful competitive advantages:  our people, our culture, and our long-term approach to investing client capital
  6. The ongoing evolution of the Firm’s distinctive culture that places clients’ interests first, always does the right thing, and always seeks to develop our people and grow their skills such that they are empowered to provide exceptional service to our clients over decades

Our success has been, and will continue to be based on our people, and their ability to communicate, build relationships, earn trust, solve problems, allocate capital wisely, and prioritize client and team interests.  

Clients

Bridges Trust has been fortunate to have an extremely supportive and patient client base.

Without clients, there would be no Bridges Trust.

Capital markets are volatile, risky, and inherently unpredictable. Notwithstanding a cogent investment philosophy and a strong investment process, results will inevitably be disappointing at times. Consequently, the patience of our client base, especially through difficult times, is essential to the long-term success of the Firm.

As we move forward, we will enhance our client-centric focus, and will continue to build and broaden our capabilities, refine and improve our processes, and drive our ability to effectively serve our clients across multiple generations.

Culture

I believe Bridges Trust’s culture is a foundational competitive advantage based on our core values of excellence, relationships, growth, service, and diligence. This culture shapes how we serve clients and collaborate internally. With our high client retention rate and a legacy of serving multi-generational families, we feel that our culture deeply resonates with clients, and is the bedrock of the Firm’s identity, a powerful competitive advantage, and a force of attraction for both clients and talented individuals.

Gratitude

I have been incredibly fortunate to work at Bridges Trust for 41 years. Over the past four decades, our team has driven significant business value growth. We have successfully managed client capital through volatility, risk, uncertainty, and change in the global economy, capital markets, and society at large.

I am grateful for the contributions of every person that has been at the Firm over those 41 years. “Bridges Trust” is the ultimate team sport – and I am grateful for the successes that our team has accomplished through a myriad of challenges.

As Co-Chairman of the Bridges Holding Company Board, my focus will be on governance. I will continue to work with clients, work with our investment team, and develop new business opportunities, as Nick and Jack assume responsibility for the day-to-day results of the firm. 

I’ve been privileged to work for clients that are amazingly supportive, and with a talented collection of professionals who are committed to serving our clients to the utmost of their ability. I am excited about the next several decades because of the expansive and promising opportunities for Bridges Trust, and the talented team that we have assembled to address those opportunities.

Let’s turn the page together.

– Ted Bridges

Bridges Trust Company Thought Leadership Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

Visionaries and Vanguard

Celebrating Munger and Mapping Berkshire’s Future

Berkshire Hathaway’s self-proclaimed “general contractor,” Warren Buffett, once again held court for the shareholder base this past Saturday. Missing was the late Charlie Munger, who Buffett described as the “Architect” of the Berkshire empire in his most recent annual shareholder letter. Only once did Buffett make the habitual deferral to his former partner, which seems forgivable for a 93-year-old chairman.

In lieu of the typical “Mungerisms”, shareholders were given additional insight from Greg Abel and Ajit Jain, who will, in all likelihood, carry the torch for capital allocation and insurance operations in the next era of Berkshire.

Abel laid out a relatively optimistic case for the expansion of Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s rate base in the coming decade, while also acknowledging persistent underperformance of Berkshire’s railroad operations. Burlington Northern’s profit margin remains substantially below its closest competitor, Union Pacific.  

Berkshire’s insurance operations continued its run of strong earnings amidst a favorable pricing environment. Ajit Jain noted that Geico’s data analytics capabilities remain stubbornly behind its primary peer, Progressive. A trend that can be extrapolated by simply comparing Progressive’s superior financial performance over the past decade.  

With record operating earnings and net stock sales of nearly $17B in the first quarter, Berkshire’s cash pile continued to swell, jumping to a record of almost $190B in the first quarter. Even if you adjust for the expanded size of its asset base, this constitutes an unnecessarily large percentage of Berkshire’s capital, in our view.   

Past performance is not indicative of future results. As of May 3, 2024

If inertia on cash deployment was prevalent with interest rates near zero, it has effectively hit a standstill with treasury bill yields above 5%. Buffett dismissed the relevance of prevailing interest rates on competition for Berkshire’s excess cash, instead reiterating the difficulty in finding “fat pitches” in the current market environment.

With such a narrow list of public and private companies that are likely to fit the criteria for Berkshire’s ownership, in size that matters, the strike zone may be simultaneously shrinking.   

Share repurchases have become a primary lever for cash deployment, with Berkshire repurchasing a total of $75B of its own stock over the past five years. But even that cadence slowed to a meager $2.6B in the first quarter, with Buffett attributing lack of liquidity to further repurchases. It is highly likely that cash will exceed $200B at the end of next quarter.

Also noteworthy was Berkshire selling nearly 13% of its Apple position in the first quarter, which still comprised nearly 40% of its public equity portfolio, and just over 15% of enterprise value. Buffett hinted that this could be related to the potential for higher capital gains rates in the future, but we find it hard to ignore the recent expansion of Apple’s valuation as an additional rationale.

As of last Friday, Berkshire Hathaway was the 7th largest U.S. company as measured by market capitalization, closing in on the $1 trillion club. Buffett noted that Berkshire’s $571 billion of shareholder equity is more than $200 billion higher than JP Morgan, the company with the second highest total, illustrative of the economic value that has accrued to Berkshire’s shareholders over time.  

Berkshire’s stock has had a strong start to 2024, with shares appreciating 12.4% through May 3rd, ahead of the S&P 500’s 8% return. Over the past 10 and 20 years, returns have been mostly in-line with the S&P 500. 

As of May 3, 2024

As we look forward, deferring to Buffett and Munger’s sage advice that forward expectations should moderate with the size of Berkshire’s business, seems prudent. Operational improvements and opportunistic deployment of excess cash offer some optionality to potential upside, but neither can be assumed. Shares are trading near our estimate of fair value, while also offering some potentially defensive characteristics. As previously stated, we feel that Berkshire is no longer a get rich stock, but a stay rich stock, and we’ve sized our allocations appropriately.

Thank you for your interest in Berkshire Hathaway and if you have any questions as a client, please don’t hesitate to reach out to your Relationship Manager. All other inquiries are welcomed by emailing contact@bridgestrust.com.

Bridges Trust Company Thought Leadership Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q1 2024

IS THERE ANYTHING LOWER RATES CAN’T CURE?

The Federal Reserve began raising interest rates two years ago in response to the highest inflation in a generation. While pundits debated how much was transitory (supply chain disruption) or structural (the largest monetary expansion on record), it was clear that easy money was stoking the inflationary fire and substantial intervention was required.

Since then, the Fed Funds effective rate has climbed from near zero to 5.3% and inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index) has retreated from 9% to 3%. U.S. economic history is fairly conclusive; most rate hiking cycles end in a recession and soft landings are rare. In fact, 1995 is the only successful soft landing since World War II. Combined with an inverted yield curve (where short rates exceed long ones), there were indications suggesting a recession was more likely than not.

Many suspected a wave of high-profile bank failures last Spring could be the first domino, yet here we are 12 months later, and the economy refuses to shrink. Last year, existing home sales fell to levels not seen since 2010, industrial production contracted, and unemployment rose by almost half a percent. But GDP kept chugging along and no one seemed to tell the stock market. 

True, the S&P 500 sold off from August to October of 2023 as interest rates on the 10-year Treasury rose from 4% to almost 5%. But since October 27th, the market has been up 18 out of the past 22 weeks largely on the prospect of lower rates. In February, the S&P 500 crossed 5,000 for the first time ever and has hit 22 all-time highs in 2024 alone. If you’re looking for an explanation, look no further than the Fed’s December Summary of Economic Projections where they suggested three rate cuts were likely in 2024.

Our continued view is that inflation progress is seldom linear (see the January CPI report) and bond investors lean premature when anticipating cuts. But the consensus seems to be that the economy will avoid a recession, Artificial Intelligence is the next Industrial Revolution, and the U.S. has unlimited borrowing capacity (despite the views of Fitch).

We issued a mea culpa last quarter, saying our cautious stance in 2023 was unwarranted and in the past five months or so, the S&P 500 is up almost 30%. We also said that we expected 2024 to be a less exceptional year than 2023. Yet through the first quarter, the S&P has returned 10% year to date, which is roughly what we expected for the year.

There is ample evidence of froth in the equity markets. After rising 240% in 2023, Nvidia is up over 80% in the past three months and is now the third largest company in the world. The VIX (an index that measures the price of hedging equity volatility) is at a post-pandemic low and prices of cryptocurrencies have gone parabolic. Market strategists are being forced to revise their year-end price targets higher just three months after setting them. 

To be fair, there is some justification for the market’s optimism. Leading economic indicators recently turned positive for the first time in two years. Fourth quarter earnings were stronger than expected and market breadth seems to be improving.

But when markets throw caution to the wind and appear unanimous in their expectation of strong returns, the phrase ‘goldilocks’ comes to mind. It’s times like these that we like to sharpen our pencils, examine our risk appetite, and ask what might the market be missing?

We don’t have an answer for you today, but we’ll keep you apprised as events warrant.

As always, thank you for your confidence and should you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out to your relationship manager.

Sincerely,

Bridges Trust Investment Committee

Bridges Trust Company Thought Leadership Disclosure

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q4 2023

The Year Few Saw Coming

“The probable is what usually happens.” – Aristotle

One of the occupational hazards of forecasting is that predictions lack the good manners to make themselves scarce once they’ve been proven wrong. An especially prescient guess might linger for a week or two, but bad calls have a much longer half-life and can follow you for years like an affection-starved labrador.

We bring this up because you might remember last year’s Market Commentary where we described our outlook for 2023 as a “Puddle of Muddle.”  Therein, we highlighted that the Fed had a poor track record of engineering soft landings, that many economic indicators were flashing yellow if not orange and we had subdued expectations for equities when it came to 2023.

Anyone who’s bothered to look at the stock market this year can see it was short on both puddles and muddles. As of this writing, December 31st, the S&P 500 is up nine weeks in a row and 24% year-to-date. Not to be outdone, the Nasdaq composite is up 43%. The current consensus seems to suggest that the economy will avoid a recession, inflation has been licked and Jay Powell has a pedestal waiting for his likeness in the Central Banker Hall of Fame.

In short, it looks like most economists got this one wrong.  

We believe that the number of recessions predicted vastly exceeds the number of recessions that have occurred, reminding us how economics earned the moniker ‘the dismal science’. Perhaps what was most confounding in 2023 is that many of the most reliable historic indicators (an aggressive hiking cycle, an inverted yield curve, contracting money supply, declining manufacturing surveys) all suggested the same thing. A recession seemed such an inevitability that in February, the Conference Board pegged its probability at 99%. Optimism would have required us to ignore 100 years of precedent and say this time really is different.  

And yet, we’ve said repeatedly that a soft landing wasn’t impossible, just improbable. In the past two months, financial conditions and sentiment have changed markedly. Since peaking in late October at 5%, the US 10-Year Treasury has declined to 3.9%. Last month, equities were up almost 9%, their second-best November since 1980. Powell gave an unusually dovish press conference in December that implied several rate cuts could be forthcoming in 2024. You’re not supposed to be able to raise rates, tame inflation, maintain full employment and grow the economy, but like the occasional buzzer-beater from half-court, the Fed might just have done it.

After spending the better part of two years harping on the subject, readers could be forgiven for thinking that recession predicting is an integral part of our process. It’s not. Our job is to evaluate capital markets, assess the risks and returns on offer, and then construct portfolios that we deem likely to meet client objectives, ever mindful that all investing involves risk. So, we proceed with a multi-decade time horizon in mind which requires a willingness to stay invested through booms and busts. Recessions are an inevitable part of any economy and trying to avoid them is a surefire way to stunt returns.

But if 2023 taught us anything it’s this. It’s better to be pleasantly surprised than bearish and right.       

That leads us to our outlook for 2024. US GDP grew almost 5% in the third quarter, and we expect a material slowdown next year as seven quarters of Fed tightening weighs on economic growth. In November, the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation was the lowest in more than two years and seems firmly in hand. We believe the Fed will cut rates in 2024 but observe the market has repeatedly over-anticipated their timing. After declining for more than a year, we expect corporate earnings to return to year-over-year growth, although estimates of 12% strike us as optimistic. We expect geopolitical tensions to remain high and the number of fiscal issues (budget deficits, high debt-to-GDP and the looming expiration of the 2017 tax cuts) all need to be addressed.   

If 2023 was the most improbable of years, we expect 2024 to be more average. A recession could still materialize, but it’s looking less and less likely, and should it happen, it may be manageable given robust labor markets and relatively healthy consumer balance sheets. We would point out that it’s unusual for progress to be linear and doubts about inflation or growth are to be expected.

Over the past five years, the S&P 500 has delivered an almost 16% total return annually. Our expectation for future returns is significantly more modest. Many of the pressures weighing on stocks in 2023 have now reversed (higher rates, higher inflation, negative earnings growth), but a soft landing is still a landing. In other words, we expect 2024 to be less exceptional than 2023 when it comes to both the economy and equity returns.

Authored by – Bridges Trust Investment Committee

Disclosures and Important Information

Bridges Trust and logo reference independent services offered by Bridges Trust Company (“BTC”), Bridges Trust Company of South Dakota (“BTC-SD”) and Bridges Investment Management Inc. (“BIM”). Trust services are provided by BTC, a trust company chartered through the Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance, and BTC–SD, a trust company chartered through the South Dakota Division of Banking. BTC, BTC-SD, and certain individual clients of BIM directly utilize the investment management services provided by BIM. BIM is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with further information including conflicts of interest and material risks available in BIM’s ADV Brochure at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/108028 and www.bridgesinv.com. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

This client communication is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to purchase, hold, or sell any security.  Information was obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, but the accuracy of the information cannot be guaranteed.  Each investor’s situation is unique so please work with your Relationship Manager to develop an individualized investment plan before investing.

Sources:  Economic data provided by FactSet Research Systems, Federal Reserve Economic Data – St. Louis Fed, U.S. Conference Board.  Insights and news provided by CNBC, Yahoo Finance, and Bloomberg.  The S&P 500 index measures the stock performance of 500 large companies listed on US stock exchanges and is provided as a benchmark representing the US stock market.  The Nasdaq Composite Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of more than 2,500 stocks listed on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange.  Indices and economic data are the property of their respective owners, all rights reserved.

Investing involves risk and the possibility of loss.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – This communication contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. We believe it is essential to communicate our expectations to our clients. However, there may be events in the future that we’re unable to predict accurately or have no control. Actual results or other conditions may differ materially from those contemplated by any forward-looking statements, and we are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained herein. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING THIRD PARTY INFORMATION – This communication includes financial information, market data, statistical information, and estimates based on materials prepared by independent sources, as well as management’s own good faith estimates and analyses. We believe this third-party information to be reputable but have not independently verified it. Information based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research, or similar methodologies or assumptions is inherently subject to uncertainties, and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances reflected in this information.

Articles that might interest you

Market Commentary Q3 2023

MARKETS DECLARE PREMATURE VICTORY

The Fed began its war on inflation in March of 2022, and 11 rate hikes later, progress has been nothing short of remarkable. While history would suggest that a soft landing was a long shot, we’ve seen meaningful iprovement in inflation, minimal job loss and instead of a slowing economy, GDP growth has accelerated. Last October, a Wall Street Journal survey of economists pegged the odds of a recession in the next twelve months at 63%. Flash forward to today and the economy may have grown as much as 3% in the third quarter, which is markedly above trend. Tight monetary policy is supposed to slow the economy as higher borrowing costs discourage consumption and incentivize saving. Apparently, the US consumer didn’t get the memo.

Core inflation peaked last September which happened to coincide with an S&P 500 trough of 3600. In the year since, progress has been persistent and long-term inflation expectations remain a well-anchored 2.2%. A series of bank failures in March initially looked as if the Fed had ‘broken something,’ and while the banking system is still quite challenged, a financial crisis has failed to materialize. Despite the Fed’s poor track record of engineering soft landings, data increasingly suggests it’s a distinct possibility.

Markets tend to get ahead of themselves, and it recently erred by assuming the Fed would immediately pivot from rate hikes to rate cuts. Students of history know that hiking cycles are rarely surprise-free, and if the 1970s taught us anything, it’s that the risks of premature easing outweigh the risk of over pumping the brakes. Being sure isn’t enough, central bankers have to be certain. So, when markets began anticipating the Fed would begin cutting as early as this Fall, we remained skeptical. Asking an economy to grow, inflation to fall and interest rates to come down struck us as a really big ask.

It’s this expectation of ‘higher for longer’ that has recently taken steam out of markets. Starting in early May, the S&P 500 was up nine weeks out of eleven. Since the Fed Meeting in late July, the market has been down seven weeks out of nine. Yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury troughed at 3.3% in April and have since risen to 4.55%, the highest since 2007, and expectations for rate cuts in 2024 have declined by two-thirds. We’re not sure why investors would expect the return of cheap money when core inflation is still north of 4%, but expect it they did.

When it comes to the outlook for the next twelve months, we remain circumspect if not outright cautious. While economic data currently paints a rosy picture, we look under the hood and see more than enough to give us pause. Estimates for 4Q GDP are an uninspiring 0%. Thanks to production cuts from the Saudis and the Russians, oil prices are up 34% in the past three months complicating further inflation progress. Thanks to rising deposit costs and the prospect of higher charge-offs, bank lending has nearly ground to a halt, which acts as a significant damper on economic growth. The potential for a government shut down, an ongoing auto strike and the resumption of student loan payments could further derail the Fed’s hard-fought progress. While the yield curve isn’t as inverted as it was, in our opinion, it remains the best recession predictor available and investors shouldn’t ignore it lightly. In other words, we may not be out of the woods quite yet.

As for equities, they’ve been largely range bound for much of the past two years. Earnings growth is currently negative and estimates are for a herculean 12% growth in 2024. Outside of the pandemic recovery and a one-time benefit from lowering the corporate tax rate in 2018, the S&P 500 hasn’t grown earnings 12% since 2011 (also a recovery year). Higher interest rates suggest a lower justified multiple on earnings as investors have competing alternatives for their capital. Higher inflation suggests a lower multiple as inflation erodes the purchasing power of said earnings. 19 times this year’s earnings (which aren’t growing) and 17 times next year’s (which seem likely to disappoint) strikes us as optimistic given our expectation for the economy to slow. The equity risk premium (the earnings yield equities offer over prevailing interest rates) is flashing orange if not red.

We have become increasingly constructive on fixed income this year given some of the most attractive (or at least most positive) real returns in decades. Measured over longer periods, we typically expect equities to outperform fixed income. That is still very much the case, but our estimates of excess return are more narrow than they’ve been in some time. We suspect the equity market may be forced to lower its expectations should it confront a slowing economy, increasingly stubborn inflation or a resolute Fed, which could lead to more attractive prices. Consequently, we’ve reduced equity exposure for many of our clients on the margin.

Given the strong performance of the equity market this year, we’re aware that this derisking has come at a cost, but we suspect we’ll see more attractive entry points in 2024 and beyond. While it seems counterintuitive to hope for volatility, we view it as an opportunity to allocate capital to great businesses at potentially more reasonable valuations.

We thank you for your support and if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out to your Relationship Manager.

Sincerely,
Bridges Trust Investment Committee

Bridges Trust Company Thought Leadership Disclosure

Articles that might interest you